Skip to main content

To people in the United States

The United States is explicating a neurology through an innovation. You are studying a neurology and an innovation.

Is the United States explicating a neurology through an innovation because the neurology matters, or because the innovation matters? Which?

How would the neurology affect the United States? If the United States is responsible for explicating the neurology, the neurology is anodyne--harmless. Why would the United States explicate a neurology anyway? If the neurology were bad for the United States, why explicate it?

On the other hand, if the explication is of an innovation, the website will publicize the innovation. The neurology was introduced by the United States. Therefore, the neurology is neutral or better to the United States--otherwise the United States would not introduce it. Therefore, the innovation is what the United States is broadcasting--the innovation matters.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

To people in the United States

 The United States either is, or isn't, going to use the website to introduce neurological capabilities. What happens? 1. The United States uses the website to introduce neurological capabilities. Edward Snowden is explained. Laws address the facts. International cooperation reassures the planet of protection from interference in domestic activity. The tactic of intentional derangement is prohibited. 2. The United States doesn't use the website to introduce neurological capabilities. Edward Snowden remains autonomous. Neurological capabilities determine justice. International competition reassures the planet of protection from interference in domestic activity. The tactic of intentional derangement is policy. 
1 comment
Read more

To the Intelligence Community

The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community reports 366 contacts via ICIGHotline@dni.gov for the April – September 2019 monitoring period. Approximately 107,000 people compose the Intelligence Community. Your participation will both defend the reality of the intentions of the subjects and defend the relationship between intentions and results. Please complete this form today.
Post a Comment
Read more

To the Intelligence Community

The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community provides the sympathetic and institutional opportunity for leniency with regard to the individuals responsible for this statement. That opportunity depends on you.  Here is the form to introduce the Inspector General to the activities of the individuals aforesaid. Please use fifteen minutes over the weekend to finish the form, and mail on Monday to ICIGhotline@dni.gov. Lawful considerations will eventually determine the situation. An intra-agency perspective necessarily differs from an external perspective. You can apply lawful considerations and sympathetic perspective by communicating with the Inspector General. I revere your cooperation. The Semiannual Report of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community notes on page 4:        More than anything, the future of whistleblowers' rights and protections in the                federal government will depend on integrity. In this sense, integrity means           
Post a Comment
Read more