The ideal resolution to the neurological expertise of the United States is the publication of the facts--that is to say the publication of the website you are reading. Objections are as stated:
1. Publicizing the website dismantles national security.
National security entails destruction. The website ignores destruction. The lethal and technological capacities of the United States remain unknown--I'm alive, I'm not a nuclear missile.
2. Publicizing the website disables another experiment.
Experiments like this rely on neurology eclipsing whatever else people are--every study will advance unusually now and then. The United States wickedly aborted an idea--neurology, the lure of neurology, invalidated the benefit of the country.
3. Publicizing the website is extreme.
Again: pertinent capacities are irrelevant and therefore unknowable, and neurology eclipsing everything is disastrous demonstrably, invidious theoretically, and repudiable immediately. The gratitude to the United States for the repudiation should concur.
Law enforcement and the ACLU are the entities to publicize, or to facilitate the publication of, the website (according, logically here, to the will of the United States government). A possibility also is you who reads this--the United States in these specific terms is perfectly evil though so potential remorse is pit against verifiable iniquity. The ideal is easier for the resourceless of course. But it might be true.
Comments
Post a Comment