Skip to main content

To people in the United States

The ideal resolution to the neurological expertise of the United States is the publication of the facts--that is to say the publication of the website you are reading. Objections are as stated:

1. Publicizing the website dismantles national security.

National security entails destruction. The website ignores destruction. The lethal and technological capacities of the United States remain unknown--I'm alive, I'm not a nuclear missile.

2. Publicizing the website disables another experiment.

Experiments like this rely on neurology eclipsing whatever else people are--every study will advance unusually now and then. The United States wickedly aborted an idea--neurology, the lure of neurology, invalidated the benefit of the country.

3. Publicizing the website is extreme.

Again: pertinent capacities are irrelevant and therefore unknowable, and neurology eclipsing everything is disastrous demonstrably, invidious theoretically, and repudiable immediately. The gratitude to the United States for the repudiation should concur.

Law enforcement and the ACLU are the entities to publicize, or to facilitate the publication of, the website (according, logically here, to the will of the United States government). A possibility also is you who reads this--the United States in these specific terms is perfectly evil though so potential remorse is pit against verifiable iniquity. The ideal is easier for the resourceless of course. But it might be true.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

To people in the United States

 The United States either is, or isn't, going to use the website to introduce neurological capabilities. What happens? 1. The United States uses the website to introduce neurological capabilities. Edward Snowden is explained. Laws address the facts. International cooperation reassures the planet of protection from interference in domestic activity. The tactic of intentional derangement is prohibited. 2. The United States doesn't use the website to introduce neurological capabilities. Edward Snowden remains autonomous. Neurological capabilities determine justice. International competition reassures the planet of protection from interference in domestic activity. The tactic of intentional derangement is policy. 
1 comment
Read more

To the Intelligence Community

The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community reports 366 contacts via ICIGHotline@dni.gov for the April – September 2019 monitoring period. Approximately 107,000 people compose the Intelligence Community. Your participation will both defend the reality of the intentions of the subjects and defend the relationship between intentions and results. Please complete this form today.
Post a Comment
Read more

To the Intelligence Community

The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community provides the sympathetic and institutional opportunity for leniency with regard to the individuals responsible for this statement. That opportunity depends on you.  Here is the form to introduce the Inspector General to the activities of the individuals aforesaid. Please use fifteen minutes over the weekend to finish the form, and mail on Monday to ICIGhotline@dni.gov. Lawful considerations will eventually determine the situation. An intra-agency perspective necessarily differs from an external perspective. You can apply lawful considerations and sympathetic perspective by communicating with the Inspector General. I revere your cooperation. The Semiannual Report of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community notes on page 4:        More than anything, the future of whistleblowers' rights and protections in the                federal government will depend on integrity. In this sense, integrity means           
Post a Comment
Read more